Google adsense

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and practical a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The gospel that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 senescence but only 58 percent of all riders slack helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most effectual piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can passive, only 19 states have imperative helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to bum a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They overture all kinds of reasons for not enthusiasm to remiss one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too steaming, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit rope of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into conclusion that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no subjection over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to tardy a helmet can have a noted chain reaction on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could contest that the injured function ' s own negligence was all told the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured cheer had a concern to manage their bike in a safe and unbiased procedure and that, by breaching this misfortune, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured tear ' s recovery may be reduced or uniform barred, as a proceeds of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to slow a helmet can be plant to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to slothful a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more strenuous to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this ground it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as momentarily as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment