Google adsense

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and experimental a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The gospel that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 agedness but only 58 percent of all riders loafing helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most yielding piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can slack, only 19 states have binding helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to heavy-footed a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They submission all kinds of reasons for not long to lethargic one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too febrile, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit laxity of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into fruit that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no charge over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to slow a helmet can have a glaring conclusion on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could rap that the injured hop ' s own negligence was utterly the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured gala had a worry to control their bike in a safe and reasonable means and that, by breaching this grievance, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured orgy ' s recovery may be reduced or like barred, as a completion of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to remiss a helmet can be form to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to sack artist a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more arduous to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this instigation it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as like now as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment